These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

451 related items for PubMed ID: 11648596

  • 1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct 21; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun 13; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS.
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1988 Jun 13; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI.
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993 Jun 13; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA.
    Temple Law Rev; 1993 Jun 13; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
    Goldstein RD.
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996 Jun 13; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec 17; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun 30; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennnsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1992 Oct 30; 978():74-8. PubMed ID: 11648602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
    Brownstein A.
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr 30; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
    Fed Suppl; 1993 May 12; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Barnes v. Mississippi.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1993 May 26; 992():1335-47. PubMed ID: 11648616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1984 May 31; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Barnes v. Moore.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1992 Aug 17; 970():12-6. PubMed ID: 11648402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich.
    Ohio. Court of Appeals, Franklin County.
    Wests North East Rep; 1993 Jul 27; 627():570-92. PubMed ID: 12041182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Appeals court upholds limits for abortions.
    Hinds Md.
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct 22; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647901
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE.
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984 Oct 22; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.