These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
107 related items for PubMed ID: 11649157
1. Mo. seeking review of its ward-of-state abortion law clause. Mintz M. Washington Post; 1979 Mar 04; ():A7. PubMed ID: 11649157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations. Baldwin ML. UMKC Law Rev; 1982 Mar 04; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation. Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976 Mar 04; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Perspectives on the abortion decision. Noble CF. N M Law Rev; 1976 Mar 04; 9(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 11665182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion statutes after Danforth: an examination. Moss GW. J Fam Law; 1976 Mar 04; 15(3):537-67. PubMed ID: 11663802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld. Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976 Mar 04; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH. Vt Law Rev; 1982 Mar 04; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA, Hawkins LB. Miss Law Rev; 1980 Mar 04; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The aftermath of Casey: is a sonogram requirement unduly burdensome? Trense CF. Law Psychol Rev; 1993 Mar 04; 17():225-41. PubMed ID: 11659925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The abortion cases. Rust ME. ABA J; 1986 Feb 04; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma. Eller TR. Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996 Feb 04; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP. St Marys Law J; 1976 Feb 04; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion regulation: the circumscription of state intervention by the doctrine of informed consent. Abbot L. Georgia Law Rev; 1981 Feb 04; 15(3):681-713. PubMed ID: 11658321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE. Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984 Feb 04; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK, Williams LB. Washburn Law J; 1993 Feb 04; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent and abortion. Kapp MB. Wis L Rev; 1993 Feb 04; 1993(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 11659680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]