These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

611 related items for PubMed ID: 11649728

  • 1. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
    Johnstone BV.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis?
    Smith GP.
    Neb Law Rev; 1984 Aug; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ, Uddo BJ.
    America (NY); 1984 Feb 11; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
    Ciulla JB.
    Psychol Today; 1987 Jan 11; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
    Conley JJ.
    America (NY); 1984 Feb 11; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL.
    Indiana Law J; 1984 Feb 11; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Baby Doe's legacy.
    Carroll JB, Andrusko D.
    America (NY); 1985 Jun 01; 152(21):450-3. PubMed ID: 11658654
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ, Balch BJ.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb 01; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N.
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan 01; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Whatever may happen to Baby Jane.
    Robinson DN.
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec 04; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11646272
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985 Dec 04; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection.
    Crossley MA.
    Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov 04; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
    Med World News; 1983 Sep 26; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. 'Baby Doe' rules sanction child abuse in the critical care nursery.
    Del Giudice S.
    Med World News; 1984 Feb 27; 25(4):122. PubMed ID: 11645509
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
    Rhoden NK.
    Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun 27; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Life and death and the handicapped newborn.
    Koop CE.
    Ethics Med; 1987 Jun 27; 3(3):39-44. PubMed ID: 11651893
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. There should never be another Baby Doe.
    Meehan M, Budde ML.
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr 02; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647759
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI.
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993 Apr 02; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
    Wakefield-Fisher M.
    Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov 02; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
    Rhoden NK.
    South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep 02; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.