These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

289 related items for PubMed ID: 11649801

  • 1. Reproductive technology and the procreation rights of the unmarried.
    Harv Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 98(3):669-85. PubMed ID: 11649801
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
    Smith GP, Iraola R.
    Marquette Law Rev; 1984 Jan; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Williams HE.
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986 Jan; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
    Krause HD.
    Fam Law Q; 1985 Jan; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
    Lorio KV.
    LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The use of in vitro fertilization: is there a right to bear or beget a child by any available medical means?
    Eccles MR.
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985 Jul; 12(4):1033-57. PubMed ID: 11655769
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law.
    Baylson MM.
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
    O'Brien S.
    Utah Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization.
    Flannery DM.
    Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
    Wadlington W.
    Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A rejoinder.
    Palmer LI.
    Jurimetrics; 1994 Apr; 35(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11660336
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
    Abbas J.
    Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
    Birck ML.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994 May; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law.
    Arnup K.
    Can J Women Law; 1994 May; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe?
    Varela MJ, Stolcke V.
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989 May; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. My body, my life, my baby, my rights.
    Levine R.
    Human Rights; 1984 May; 12(1):27-29, 46-50. PubMed ID: 11649863
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
    Palmer LI.
    Jurimetrics; 1994 May; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reconceiving privacy: relationships and reproductive technology.
    Rao R.
    UCLA Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 45(4):1077-123. PubMed ID: 11660817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Parenthood by pure intention: assisted reproduction and the functional approach to parentage.
    Storrow RF.
    Hastings Law J; 2002 Mar; 53(3):597-679. PubMed ID: 12680380
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prohibiting payments to surrogate mothers: love's labor lost and the constitutional right to privacy.
    Bradley TS.
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 20(4):715-45. PubMed ID: 11650095
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.