These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 11649833

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Do human cells have rights?
    Warnock M.
    Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Developments in biotechnology: ethical perspectives.
    O'Rourke K.
    Linacre Q; 1989 Nov; 56(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 11659198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Moral philosophy and public policy: the case of NRTs.
    Kymlicka W.
    Bioethics; 1993 Jan; 7(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 11654026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Lords oppose embryo research.
    New Sci; 1984 Nov 08; 104(1429):6. PubMed ID: 11655672
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The debate about Dolly.
    Klotzko AJ.
    Bioethics; 1997 Oct 08; 11(5):427-38. PubMed ID: 11655121
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ten years on from the Warnock Report: is the human embryo a person?
    Puca A.
    Linacre Q; 1995 May 08; 62(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 11654680
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
    Kass LR.
    New Repub; 1997 Jun 02; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov 10; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Embryo research.
    Robertson JA.
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Nov 10; 24(1):15-37. PubMed ID: 11658730
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Embryonic research.
    New Sci; 1984 Sep 27; 103(1423):2. PubMed ID: 11658549
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Embryo cell research: a clash of values.
    Wade N.
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul 02; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11648122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Warnock versus Powell (and Harradine): when does potentiality count?
    Lockwood M.
    Bioethics; 1988 Jul 02; 2(3):187-213. PubMed ID: 11659014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Warnock fuels debate over 14-day rule.
    New Sci; 1984 Jul 26; 103(1414):3-4. PubMed ID: 11658480
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
    Gillon R.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun 26; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
    Gregoratos B.
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May 26; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.