These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1290 related items for PubMed ID: 11649890
1. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J. IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. government-sponsored radiation research on humans 1945-1975. McCally M, Cassel C, Kimball DG. Med Glob Surviv; 1994 Mar; 1(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 11652281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ. N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan 09; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects. Wheeler DL. Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan 26; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research. Shore D, Berg K, Mullican C. J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994 Jan 26; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS, Levine RJ. IRB; 1982 Oct 26; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul 26; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH. Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975 Jul 26; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The development of policy guidelines governing human experimentation in the United States: a case study of public policy-making for science and technology. Frankel MS. Ethics Sci Med; 1975 May 26; 2(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 765128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE). Martensen R. Med Humanit Rev; 1997 May 26; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF. Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975 May 26; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gene therapy in mental retardation: ethical considerations. Fletcher JC. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 1995 May 26; 1():7-13. PubMed ID: 11660293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects. Macklin R. IRB; 1989 May 26; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan 26; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital failed on human research policy. Science; 1998 Nov 06; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III). Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan 06; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975 Jan 06; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]