These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 11650182

  • 1. "Two steps forward, one step back": an analysis of New Jersey's latest "right-to-die" decisions.
    Moore NJ.
    Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):955-98. PubMed ID: 11650182
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
    Jarrett C.
    Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
    Allsopp ME.
    Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
    Weinberg JK.
    Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
    Cantor NL.
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
    Colabrese CA.
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. From medicalization to legalization to politicization: O'Connor, Cruzan, and refusal of treatment in the 1990s.
    Johnson SH.
    Conn Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 21(3):685-722. PubMed ID: 11650431
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights.
    Suhr JN.
    Am Univ Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The right to death.
    Dworkin R.
    New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan 31; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
    Gilbert LJ.
    J Fam Law; 1991 Jan 31; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
    Cantor NL.
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1985 Jan 31; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die.
    Mehrle JP.
    North KY Law Rev; 1994 Jan 31; 21(2):449-74. PubMed ID: 11653010
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
    Delaney JJ.
    Pace Law Rev; 1991 Jan 31; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
    Strasser M.
    KY Law J; 1991 Jan 31; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
    Sullivan JF.
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun 25; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG.
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988 Jun 25; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
    Robertson JA.
    Georgia Law Rev; 1991 Jun 25; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
    Tomlinson AK.
    Pace Law Rev; 1988 Jun 25; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
    Watson DE.
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991 Jun 25; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE.
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981 Jun 25; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.