These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE. Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ. J Fam Law; 1991; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y. Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court. Greenhouse L. N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec 07; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN. Am Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec 07; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R, Harty-Golder B. Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988 Dec 07; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]