These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

488 related items for PubMed ID: 11651386

  • 1. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
    Bolton V, Osborn J, Servante D.
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
    Stenger RL.
    J Law Health; 1992 Jun; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
    Deitch R.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul 28; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The embryo bill.
    Cameron NM.
    Ethics Med; 1989 Jul 28; 5(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 11650335
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban.
    Clarke M.
    Nature; 1985 Feb 21; 313(6004):618. PubMed ID: 11658513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology.
    Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly.
    Hum Reprod; 1986 Jun 21; 1(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 11643963
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The British law on assisted reproduction: a liberal law by comparison with many other European laws.
    Sutton A.
    Ethics Med; 1996 Jun 21; 12(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 11660744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Embryo research and fertilisation code.
    Walker A.
    BMJ; 1991 Mar 30; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prisoners of progress or hostages to fortune?
    Morgan D, Nielsen L.
    J Law Med Ethics; 1993 Mar 30; 21(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 11652120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
    Gillon R.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun 30; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Embryos in the news.
    Mulkay M.
    Public Underst Sci; 1994 Jun 30; 3():33-51. PubMed ID: 11659866
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G.
    New Sci; 1986 Dec 18; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Changing minds about embryo research.
    Mulkay M.
    Public Underst Sci; 1994 Dec 18; 3():195-213. PubMed ID: 11659865
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Parliament gives overwhelming approval to embryo research.
    Coghlan A.
    New Sci; 1990 Apr 28; 126(1714):29. PubMed ID: 11655969
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Embryo research: British debate under way.
    Nature; 1989 Nov 30; 342(6249):463. PubMed ID: 11644395
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
    Gregoratos B.
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May 30; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Regulating the new reproductive technologies: a cross-channel comparison.
    Latham M.
    Med Law Int; 1998 May 30; 3(2-3):89-115. PubMed ID: 11657600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr 08; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Brave new world.
    Lancet; 1985 Mar 02; 1(8427):535. PubMed ID: 11644445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
    Great Britain.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov 02; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.