These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

304 related items for PubMed ID: 11651893

  • 21. Infanticide and its apologists.
    Tedeschi M.
    Commentary; 1984 Nov; 78(5):31-5. PubMed ID: 11658565
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. 'Government directive on infant euthanasia is ambiguous.
    Klug J.
    Ob Gyn News; 1984 Nov; 17(16):11. PubMed ID: 11653462
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Protecting handicapped infants.
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec 04; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI.
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993 Dec 04; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ, Balch BJ.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb 04; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Nontreatment decisions for severely compromised newborns.
    Kipnis K, Williamson GM.
    Ethics; 1984 Oct 04; 95(1):90-111. PubMed ID: 11651788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Termination of medical treatment: the setting of moral limits from infancy to old age.
    Walter JJ.
    Relig Stud Rev; 1990 Oct 04; 16(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 11659701
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
    Conley JJ.
    America (NY); 1984 Feb 11; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis.
    Wood AT.
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1985 Feb 11; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
    Rhoden NK.
    South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep 11; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap; procedures and guidelines relating to health care for handicapped infants.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Jan 12; 48(8):1622-54. PubMed ID: 11655570
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Senate concurrent resolution 101--concurrent resolution relating to the right to life of handicapped infants.
    Denton J.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1982 May 26; 128(66):S6143-55. PubMed ID: 11651738
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The killing words? How the new quality-of-life ethic affects people with severe disabilities.
    HarveyParedes T.
    SMU Law Rev; 1992 May 26; 46(3):805-40. PubMed ID: 11659757
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ, Uddo BJ.
    America (NY); 1984 Feb 11; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.