These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding. Born MA. KY Law J; ; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Protecting handicapped infants. Washington Post; 1984 Dec 04; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK. South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep 04; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations. Bermel J. Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec 04; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R. Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb 24; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns. Goichman G. South Univ Law Rev; 1983 Sep 26; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. United States: treatment of severely handicapped infants. Lancet; 1983 Oct 22; 2(8356):960-1. PubMed ID: 11644271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection. Crossley MA. Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov 22; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants. Smith SR. NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982 Nov 22; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]