These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
359 related items for PubMed ID: 11652439
1. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983). Crook RR. Cumberland Law Rev; ; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983). Chrisman JP. Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Barber v. Superior Court of State of California; Nejdl v. Superior Court of State of California. California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2. Wests Calif Report; 1983 Oct 12; 195():484-94. PubMed ID: 11648259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M. KY Law J; 1983 Oct 12; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Living will statutes: the first decade. Gelfand G. Wis L Rev; 1987 Oct 12; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers. Greenfield RE. St Marys Law J; 1986 Oct 12; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I, Bilzor JC, Hafemeister TL, Brown V, Dudyshyn D. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989 Oct 12; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Death and dying in Tennessee. McKenney EJ. Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977 Oct 12; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Judge rules for doctors in plug-pulling murder charge. Med World News; 1983 Apr 11; 24(7):28-9. PubMed ID: 11653500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Drabick. Di Somma AV. Issues Law Med; 1989 Apr 11; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E. Glendale Law Rev; 1989 Apr 11; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH. Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988 Apr 11; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ. Clin Ethics Rep; 1995 Apr 11; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Death and life decisions: who is in control? Kenney SC. Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr 11; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Bayer. Di Somma AV. Issues Law Med; 1988 Apr 11; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]