These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

817 related items for PubMed ID: 11652477

  • 1. Medical ethics in life and death.
    Thompson R.
    Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb 24; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR.
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May 24; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS, Barthel R.
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May 24; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
    Rhoden NK.
    South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep 24; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Legal perspectives on institutional ethics committees.
    Capron AM.
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985 Sep 24; 11(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 11651865
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL.
    Indiana Law J; 1985 Sep 24; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
    Ciulla JB.
    Psychol Today; 1987 Jan 24; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ.
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug 24; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M.
    Ob Gyn News; 1984 Aug 24; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions.
    Nicholson EB, Horowitz RM, Parry J, American Bar Association. Commission on the Mentally Disabled, American Bar Association. National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986 Aug 24; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma.
    Jakobovits Y.
    Tradition; 1986 Aug 24; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.