These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
238 related items for PubMed ID: 11652485
21. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference. Richard SM. Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML. Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR. West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R, Harty-Golder B. Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM. Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Right-to-die order revoked as patient in coma awakes. Verhovek SH. N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr 13; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11646710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Withholding and withdrawing life support. Raffin TA. Hosp Pract; 1991 Mar 15; 26(3):133-136, 140-141, 145. PubMed ID: 11652589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law. Jarrett C. Rutgers Law J; 1988 Mar 15; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center. Kirkpatrick GA. Issues Law Med; 1987 May 15; 2(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 11644074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Beyond the living will: making advance directives more useful. Culver CM, Gert B. Omega (Westport); 1990 May 15; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11652562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey. Sullivan JF. N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun 25; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment. Matthews MA. Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar 25; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL. Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985 Mar 25; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In re Bayer. Di Somma AV. Issues Law Med; 1988 Mar 25; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients. Cantor NL. Rutgers Law Rev; 1985 Mar 25; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide? Beatty JA. Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr 25; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM. Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar 25; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM. Jurimetrics; 1989 Apr 25; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Another state joins right-to-die issue. Robbins W. N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov 25; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]