These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
966 related items for PubMed ID: 11652581
21. Euthanasia: the handwriting on the wall. Marzen TJ. Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11649266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference. Richard SM. Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia? Banja JD. J Neurosurg Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11659424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. U.S. Supreme Court. Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun 25; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons. Bopp J, Avila D. Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar 25; 42(3):779-815. PubMed ID: 11652587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged. United States Catholic Conference. Origins; 1989 Oct 26; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination. DiCamillo JA. Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992 Oct 26; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin? Lomasky LE. Reason; 1990 Nov 26; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The real ethic of death and dying. Cantor NL. Mich Law Rev; 1996 May 26; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience. Weinberg JK. Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov 26; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die. Berman MB. Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992 Nov 26; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J, Avila D. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991 Nov 26; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH. St Louis Univ Law J; 1986 Nov 26; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The "right to die": a case study in American lawmaking. Meisel A. Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar 26; 3(1):49-74. PubMed ID: 11654848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case. Martyn SR, Bourguignon HJ. Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar 26; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R. Rutgers Law Rev; 1994 Mar 26; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court. Greenhouse L. N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec 07; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]