These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

196 related items for PubMed ID: 11653297

  • 1. Choosing who will be disabled: genetic intervention and the morality of inclusion.
    Buchanan A.
    Soc Philos Policy; 1996; 13(2):18-46. PubMed ID: 11653297
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Amniocentesis and selective abortion.
    Silber TJ.
    Pediatr Ann; 1981 Oct; 10(10):397-400. PubMed ID: 11643678
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Genes, embryos, and future people.
    Glannon W.
    Bioethics; 1998 Jul; 12(3):187-211. PubMed ID: 11656689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mastering our gen(i)es: when do we say no?
    Meilaender G.
    Christ Century; 1990 Oct 03; 107(27):872-5. PubMed ID: 11659274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics.
    Harding JR.
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991 Oct 03; 18(1):471-512. PubMed ID: 11659992
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Medical genetics: its presuppositions, possibilities and problems.
    Jochemsen H.
    Ethics Med; 1992 Oct 03; 8(2):18-31. PubMed ID: 11659863
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.
    Shakespeare T.
    Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov 03; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr 03; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Human Genome Initiative, women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA.
    Reprod Health Matters; 1994 Nov 03; No. 4():80-6. PubMed ID: 11660737
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Map, myth, or medium of redemption: how do we interpret the Human Genome Project?
    Lysaught MT.
    Second Opin; 1994 Apr 03; 19(4):76-84. PubMed ID: 11645259
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Whose genome project?
    Macer D.
    Bioethics; 1991 Jul 03; 5(3):183-211. PubMed ID: 11659339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ethics, law, and medical genetics: after the human genome is mapped.
    Fletcher JC, Wertz DC.
    Emory Law J; 1990 Jul 03; 39(3):747-809. PubMed ID: 11653908
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
    Robertson JA.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1996 Jun 03; 76(3):421-82. PubMed ID: 11660289
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Embryos created for research purposes.
    Davis DS.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Dec 03; 5(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 11645314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.