These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


427 related items for PubMed ID: 11653509

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
    Capron AM.
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr 23; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The legacy of Infant Doe.
    Cosby MG.
    Bayl Law Rev; 1982 Apr 23; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Baby Jane Doe.
    America (NY); 1983 Nov 19; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul 26; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ.
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992 Jul 26; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
    Wakefield-Fisher M.
    Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov 26; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR.
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May 26; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Refusal of lifesaving treatment for minors.
    Annas GJ.
    J Fam Law; 1986 May 26; 23(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 11651846
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe.
    Cantrell DF.
    Indiana Law Rev; 1986 May 26; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations.
    Bermel J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec 26; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Medical ethics in life and death.
    Thompson R.
    Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb 24; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P, Kuhse H.
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar 01; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The "Baby Doe" legislation: its rise and fall.
    Moss K.
    Policy Stud J; 1987 Jun 01; 15(4):629-51. PubMed ID: 11651898
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.