These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 11654455

  • 1. Drug-induced alteration of psychotic behavior: who benefits?
    Schaefer GJ.
    J Law Health; ; 9(1):43-68. PubMed ID: 11654455
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ.
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond.
    Floyd J.
    Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996 Oct; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Refusal of medical treatment in "captive" circumstances.
    Somerville MA.
    Can Bar Rev; 1985 Oct; 63():59-90. PubMed ID: 11660372
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
    Gutierrez L.
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994 Oct; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cichon DE.
    LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May 19; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
    Wade MD.
    Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976 May 19; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.