These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


400 related items for PubMed ID: 11655139

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The regulation of assisted conception in England.
    Stern K.
    Eur J Health Law; 1994; 1(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11654549
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Embryo research and fertilisation code.
    Walker A.
    BMJ; 1991 Mar 30; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Storage of gametes or embryos for cancer patients.
    Great Britain. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Feb 30; No. 115():8-10. PubMed ID: 11660247
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The British law on assisted reproduction: a liberal law by comparison with many other European laws.
    Sutton A.
    Ethics Med; 1996 Feb 30; 12(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 11660744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Lessons learned from Great Britain's Human Fertilization and Embryology Act: should the United States regulate the fate of unused frozen embryos?
    Kuo L.
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1997 Aug 30; 19(4):1027-53. PubMed ID: 11660675
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
    Stenger RL.
    J Law Health; 1997 Aug 30; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The embryo bill.
    Cameron NM.
    Ethics Med; 1989 Aug 30; 5(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 11650335
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In Britain and Australia, new in vitro guidelines.
    Levine C.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Feb 30; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 11643983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of fetal eggs and infertility treatment: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, section 3A.
    Grubb A.
    Med Law Rev; 1995 Feb 30; 3(2):203-4. PubMed ID: 11656732
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. First batch of human embryos destroyed in UK.
    Hopkins KD.
    Lancet; 1996 Aug 10; 348(9024):399. PubMed ID: 11660280
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Council agrees response to Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan 19; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Surrogate arrangements and parental orders: the Parental Orders (Human Fertilisation and Embryology) Regulations 1994 (S.I. 1994 No. 2767).
    Grubb A.
    Med Law Rev; 1995 Jan 19; 3(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 11656733
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Regulating the new reproductive technologies: a cross-channel comparison.
    Latham M.
    Med Law Int; 1998 Jan 19; 3(2-3):89-115. PubMed ID: 11657600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lords' vote saves supply of research embryos.
    New Sci; 1990 Mar 17; 25(1708):22. PubMed ID: 11655968
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Embryo research: British debate under way.
    Nature; 1989 Nov 30; 342(6249):463. PubMed ID: 11644395
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul 28; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Law for protection of embryos.
    Germany.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec 28; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.