These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

680 related items for PubMed ID: 11655324

  • 21. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada).
    NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Research compliance changes will affect rules on protection of human subjects.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 May; 14(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657776
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Annual review: observed deficiencies and suggested corrections.
    Adams MS, Conrad DA.
    IRB; 1996 May; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654743
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. New initiative to accredit all institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11658058
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG.
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002 Jul; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Institutional review boards not paying enough attention to active research projects.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Nov; 13(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657741
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Questions and answers.
    Goodwin FK.
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994 Nov; 5(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 11653321
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
    Wichman A, Mills D, Sandler AL.
    IRB; 1996 Nov; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS.
    Bayer R, Levine C, Murray TH.
    IRB; 1984 Nov; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Continuing IRB review when research activity is limited to routine follow-up evaluations.
    Amdur RJ, Bankert E.
    IRB; 1997 Nov; 19(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11654739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH.
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975 Nov; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
    Brody M.
    HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM, Lavery JV, Sutherland HJ, Till JE.
    IRB; 1994 Nov; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
    Hogue LL.
    Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978 Nov; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.