These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
394 related items for PubMed ID: 11655326
1. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories. McGough H. IRB; 1998; 20(1):9, 11. PubMed ID: 11655326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Two rules on expedited IRB reviews are final. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED, Gordon B. IRB; 1997 Jan; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe. Kiernan V. New Sci; 1996 Jun 08; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research. Menasché A, Levine RJ. IRB; 1995 Jun 08; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review board approval required by rule. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug 08; 11(8):3. PubMed ID: 11654440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan 08; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The history of institutional review boards. Sherman M, Van Vleet JD. Regul Aff J; 1991 Jan 08; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters. van Eys J, Levine RJ. IRB; 1984 Jan 08; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct 08; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB. Mitchell SC, Steingrub J. IRB; 1988 Oct 08; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1996 May 08; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan 08; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Annual review: observed deficiencies and suggested corrections. Adams MS, Conrad DA. IRB; 1996 Jan 08; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research compliance changes will affect rules on protection of human subjects. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1999 May 08; 14(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of institutional review boards on clinical research. Levine RJ. Perspect Biol Med; 1999 May 08; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul 08; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An overview of FDA, IRBs and regulations. Petricciani JC. IRB; 1981 Dec 08; 3(10):1-3, 11. PubMed ID: 11649413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep 08; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH. Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975 Sep 08; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]