These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 11655625

  • 21. Morgentaler v. The Queen. 26 Mar 1975.
    Canada. Supreme Court.
    Dom Law Rep; 1975; 53():161-215. PubMed ID: 12038309
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reconciling the irreconcilable? Recent developments in the German law on abortion.
    Smit DV.
    Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(3):302-20. PubMed ID: 11657029
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Tough abortion law provokes dismay in Poland.
    Darnton J.
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar 11; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647466
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Womb for debate.
    Blinken AJ.
    New Repub; 1991 Jul 08; 205(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 11656088
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Simopoulos v. Commonwealth of Virginia.
    Virginia. Supreme Court.
    South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Apr 24; 277():194-205. PubMed ID: 12041320
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Population screening: the role of the law.
    Gevers S.
    Eur J Health Law; 1998 Mar 24; 5(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 11657116
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Legal problems related to abortion and menstrual regulation.
    Dourlen-Rollier AM.
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1975 Mar 24; 7(1):120-35. PubMed ID: 11662223
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
    Kindregan CP.
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990 Mar 24; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A beau mentir qui vient de loin: the 1988 Canadian abortion decision in comparative perspective.
    Glendon MA.
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1989 Mar 24; 83(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11655964
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Ireland: abortion: "X" + "Y".
    Ward P.
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1989 Mar 24; 33(2):385-407. PubMed ID: 11656451
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Abortion.
    Louisiana.
    Revis Statut La; 1992 Mar 24; Sects. 14.87 to 14.88():7 to 14:88. PubMed ID: 12043685
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.