These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL. Indiana Law J; ; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R. Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb 24; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond. Phillips CA. Calif West Law Rev; 1985 Feb 24; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK. South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep 24; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life. Wakefield-Fisher M. Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov 24; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions. Nicholson EB, Horowitz RM, Parry J, American Bar Association. Commission on the Mentally Disabled, American Bar Association. National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986 Nov 24; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]