These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 11655881

  • 1. The abortion of a foetus incapable of being born alive.
    Aust Law J; 1987 Jul; 61(7):326-8. PubMed ID: 11655881
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Protecting the life of the unborn child.
    Grubb A, Pearl D.
    Law Q Rev; 1987 Jul; 103():340-6. PubMed ID: 11658992
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. C v. S.
    Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division (23, 24, 25 Feb 1987) [and] Queen's Bench Division (17, 18, 20, 21, 23 Feb 1987).
    All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Jul; [1987] 1():1230-44. PubMed ID: 11648562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law.
    Cica N.
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA.
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
    Kindregan CP.
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990 Mar; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP.
    St Marys Law J; 1976 Mar; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep 21; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
    Curry RE.
    J Fam Law; 1981 Sep 21; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun 30; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA.
    Temple Law Rev; 1993 Jun 30; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.