These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

365 related items for PubMed ID: 11655923

  • 21. Government funding in Title X projects: circumscribing the constitutional rights of the indigent: Rust v. Sullivan.
    Maher L.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):143-82. PubMed ID: 11656260
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
    Pear R.
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar 04; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug 04; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993.
    Axel DA.
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Aug 04; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid.
    Vuernick R.
    J Contemp Law; 1993 Aug 04; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A.
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul 17; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
    Wilkins RG, Sherlock R, Clark S.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991 Jul 17; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The aftermath of Casey: is a sonogram requirement unduly burdensome?
    Trense CF.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993 Jul 17; 17():225-41. PubMed ID: 11659925
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
    Chopko ME.
    Campbell Law Rev; 1990 Jul 17; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW.
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991 Jul 17; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Paying for abortion: is the Court wrong?
    Shinn Re.
    Christ Crisis; 1977 Sep 19; 37(14):202-7. PubMed ID: 11663787
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.