These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 11656174

  • 1. A legal strategy to overturn Roe v. Wade after Webster: some lessons from Lincoln.
    Forsythe CD.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):519-60. PubMed ID: 11656174
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion.
    Greenhouse L, Dionne EJ.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul 04; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Taking aim at Roe v. Wade.
    Gorney C.
    Washington Post; 1989 Apr 09; ():18-26, 42-44. PubMed ID: 11655908
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Political and socioeconomic indicators of state restrictiveness toward abortion.
    Strickland RA, Whicker ML.
    Policy Stud J; 1992 Apr 09; 20(4):598-617. PubMed ID: 11660186
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct 09; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. After Roe v. Wade: 10 years' conflict over abortion.
    Peterson B, Barbash F, Russell C.
    Washington Post; 1983 Jan 23; ():A1, A12-13. PubMed ID: 11647346
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. American abortion debate.
    Marwick C.
    BMJ; 1989 Apr 22; 298(6680):1055-6. PubMed ID: 11644409
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
    Estrich SR, Sullivan KM.
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov 22; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G.
    Women Polit; 1991 Nov 22; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Understanding the new politics of abortion: a framework and agenda for research.
    Goggin ML.
    Am Polit Q; 1993 Jan 22; 21(1):4-30. PubMed ID: 11656206
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The boundaries of abortion law: systems theory from Parsons to Luhmann and Habermas.
    Deflem M.
    Soc Forces; 1998 Mar 22; 76(3):775-818. PubMed ID: 11657525
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990 Mar 22; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The abortion debate after Webster: the Catholic-American moment.
    Maestri WF.
    Linacre Q; 1990 Feb 22; 57(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11651980
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA.
    Hum Life Rev; 1994 Feb 22; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abortions.
    Maryland.
    Michies Annot Code Public Gen Laws Md Md; 1991 Jul 01; Sects. 20.201 to 20.211 20.214():. PubMed ID: 12043607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Connecticut city to hold a vote on abortions.
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Aug 18; ():35L. PubMed ID: 11646167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Justice Holmes and Roe v. Wade.
    Novick SM.
    Trial; 1989 Dec 18; 25(12):58-64. PubMed ID: 11656018
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.