These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

363 related items for PubMed ID: 11656422

  • 1. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
    Brownstein A.
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA.
    Temple Law Rev; 1993 Apr; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
    Goldstein RD.
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996 Apr; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI.
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993 Apr; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS.
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993 Apr; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA.
    Hum Life Rev; 1994 Apr; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB.
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993 Apr; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun 30; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reproduction and the law.
    Erickson NS.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985 Jun 30; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA.
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987 Jun 30; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP.
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993 Jun 30; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.