These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

453 related items for PubMed ID: 11656475

  • 1. Emergency trials 'by popular consent.
    Kiernan V.
    New Sci; 1995 Nov 04; 148(2002):6. PubMed ID: 11656475
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
    Menasché A, Levine RJ.
    IRB; 1995 Nov 04; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An update on the PEG-SOD study involving incompetent subjects: FDA permits an exception to informed consent requirements.
    Prentice ED, Antonson DL, Leibrock LG, Prabhu VC, Kelso TK, Sears TD.
    IRB; 1994 Nov 04; 16(1-2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11652322
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. IRB review of a Phase II randomized clinical trial involving incompetent patients suffering from severe closed head injury.
    Prentice ED, Antonson DL, Leibrock LG, Kelso TK, Sears TD.
    IRB; 1993 Nov 04; 15(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 11659703
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
    Mitchell SC, Steingrub J.
    IRB; 1988 Nov 04; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
    Freedman B.
    IRB; 1994 Nov 04; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An even safer safety net.
    Prentice E.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997 Nov 04; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Federal agency's final rule says informed consent forms must be dated.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Dec 04; 11(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11655034
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. FDA's new rule on treatment use and sale of investigational new drugs.
    Levine RJ.
    IRB; 1987 Dec 04; 9(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649946
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep 04; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ban on medical experiments without consent is relaxed.
    Kolata G.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Nov 05; ():A1, C6. PubMed ID: 11647142
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
    van Eys J, Levine RJ.
    IRB; 1984 Nov 05; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
    Macklin R.
    IRB; 1989 Nov 05; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Changing federal regulation of IRB's: the Commission's recommendations and the FDA's proposals.
    Levine RJ.
    IRB; 1979 Mar 05; 1(1):1-3+. PubMed ID: 11662736
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Exception from informed consent for emergency research: drawing on existing skills and experience.
    Davis AM.
    IRB; 1998 Mar 05; 20(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11657584
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The FDA's enforcement of IRBs and patient informed consent.
    Kelsey FO.
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jan 05; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11651627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
    Brodeur D.
    Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992 Jan 05; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
    Prentice ED, Gordon B.
    IRB; 1997 Jan 05; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM.
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988 Jan 05; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Two rules on expedited IRB reviews are final.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan 05; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657557
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.