These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP. Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom. Copelon R. Rev Law Soc Change; 1993; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors. Schmidt CG. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB. St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Autonomy's magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation. Allen AL. Boston Univ Law Rev; 1992 Sep; 72(4):683-98. PubMed ID: 11656223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker. Burns SE. Harv Womens Law J; 1990 Sep; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Colker R. Harv Womens Law J; 1990 Sep; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion. Koppelman A. Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990 Sep; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose. Binion G. Women Polit; 1991 Sep; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA. Marquette Law Rev; 1987 Sep; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees. Annas GJ. Am J Law Med; 1989 Sep; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]