These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 11657174

  • 1. The slippery slope.
    Doyle K, Carroll A.
    New Law J; 1996 May 24; 146(6745):759-61. PubMed ID: 11657174
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Withdrawal of treatment.
    Tomkin D, McAuley A.
    New Law J; 1995 Aug 11; 145(6708):1234-5. PubMed ID: 11654490
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A "terrible beauty", the Irish Supreme Court, and dying.
    Feenan D.
    Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar 11; 3(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11654847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Courts entangled in feeding tube controversies.
    Mishkin B.
    Nutr Clin Pract; 1986 Aug 11; 1(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 11652485
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
    Feenan D.
    J Ir Med Assoc; 1995 Aug 11; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
    Crook RR.
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1995 Aug 11; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Incompetent patient in PVS: views of relatives and "best interests": Re G.
    Grubb A.
    Med Law Rev; 1995 Aug 11; 3(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11656729
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Decisions and responsibilities at the end of life: euthanasia and clinically assisted death.
    Biggs H.
    Med Law Int; 1996 Aug 11; 2(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 11660677
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I, Bilzor JC, Hafemeister TL, Brown V, Dudyshyn D.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989 Aug 11; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
    Glick HR.
    West Polit Q; 1992 Aug 11; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Withdrawing treatment from patients in a persistent vegetative state.
    Gerber P.
    Med J Aust; 1992 Aug 11; 161(11-12):715-7. PubMed ID: 11660024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Right-to-die order revoked as patient in coma awakes.
    Verhovek SH.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr 13; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11646710
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Gray v. Romeo.
    Di Somma AV.
    Issues Law Med; 1989 Apr 13; 4(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 11644379
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. House of Lords on care for dying.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb 13; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland.
    Great Britain. House of Lords.
    All Engl Law Rep; 1993 Feb 04; [1993]1():821-96. PubMed ID: 11648606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Nancy Cruzan case.
    McCormick RA.
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1989 Feb 04; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
    Paulus SM.
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan 04; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
    Harvey JC, Quinn KP, Johnson SH.
    Commonweal; 1990 May 04; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.