These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

529 related items for PubMed ID: 11658067

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
    Reiser SJ, Knudson P.
    IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Government guinea pigs.
    Rothman DJ.
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan 09; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
    Roth LH, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade WJ.
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987 Jan 09; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE).
    Martensen R.
    Med Humanit Rev; 1997 Jan 09; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Hospital failed on human research policy.
    Science; 1998 Nov 06; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Gene therapy in mental retardation: ethical considerations.
    Fletcher JC.
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 1995 Nov 06; 1():7-13. PubMed ID: 11660293
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Whatever made them do it?
    Estling R.
    New Sci; 1995 Jan 21; 145(1961):48-9. PubMed ID: 11656388
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan 21; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Research subject loses case against physician, IRB, and hospital.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Feb 21; 10(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654160
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. U.S. government-sponsored radiation research on humans 1945-1975.
    McCally M, Cassel C, Kimball DG.
    Med Glob Surviv; 1994 Mar 21; 1(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 11652281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan 21; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
    Jellinek MS, Levine RJ.
    IRB; 1982 Oct 21; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
    Prentice ED, Gordon B.
    IRB; 1997 Oct 21; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH.
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975 Oct 21; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Power, advocacy, and informed consent forms.
    Smith ML.
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994 Oct 21; 5(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11653311
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
    Society; 1975 Oct 21; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.