These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

437 related items for PubMed ID: 11658425

  • 1. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
    Buchanan E.
    Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD.
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA.
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH, Hawn RH.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW.
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG, Dobson TA.
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992 Dec; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes.
    Byrne TJ.
    Loyola Law Rev; 1982 Dec; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Understanding the United States Supreme Court's position on parental consent requirements: in defense of Danforth and Bellotti--a response to Crutchfield.
    Rodman H.
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 11651712
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.