These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

658 related items for PubMed ID: 11658455

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS.
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.
    Furrow BR.
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P.
    J Law Health; 1984; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
    Schwartz SJ, Costanzo CE.
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
    Barnhart BA, Pinkerton ML, Roth RT.
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment.
    Schwartz BM.
    Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD.
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
    Roth LH.
    Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996 May; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
    Brooks WM.
    Touro Law Rev; 1991 May; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Civil rights--a mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs: a constitutional right needing protection.
    Lafferty M, Lawrence WJ, Lusvardi AA.
    Notre Dame Lawyer; 1981 Dec; 57(2):406-19. PubMed ID: 11658500
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The right to refuse treatment in New Jersey.
    Perlin ML.
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11662299
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
    Wade MD.
    Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
    Redding RE.
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment.
    Allan A, Allan M.
    S Afr Law J; 1997 Jun; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication.
    Gross J.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun 11; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ.
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993 Jun 11; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In re Schmidt.
    Minnesota. Supreme Court.
    Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jul 28; 443():824-30. PubMed ID: 12041163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.