These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
307 related items for PubMed ID: 11658600
1. Robak v. United States: a precedent-setting damage formula for wrongful birth. Leightman CW. Chic Kent Law Rev; 1982; 58(3):725-64. PubMed ID: 11658600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Robak v. United States. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Fed Report; 1981 Aug 25; 658():471-80. PubMed ID: 11648469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal recognition of medical malpractice tort claims based upon theories of wrongful birth and wrongful life. Mayo KL. North Carol Centr Law J; 1985 Aug 25; 15(2):274-94. PubMed ID: 11658795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tort liability for wrongfully causing one to be born. Sarno GG. Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978 Aug 25; 83():15-110. PubMed ID: 12091930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Washington recognizes wrongful birth and wrongful life: a critical analysis--Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc., 98 Wn.2d 460, 656 P.2d 483 (l983). VanDerhoef PJ. Wash Law Rev; 1983 Jul 25; 58(3):649-78. PubMed ID: 11658507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Wrongful birth: judicial reticence with an emerging tort--the negligent performance of genetic counseling--Berman v. Allan, 80 N.J. 421, 404 A.2d 8 (1979). Brower C. Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1981 Jul 25; 6(1):115-33. PubMed ID: 11651739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrongful life and a fundamental right to be born healthy: Park v. Chessin; Becker v. Schwartz. Klodowski HF. Buffalo Law Rev; 1978 Jul 25; 27(3):537-61. PubMed ID: 11665018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The trend toward judicial recognition of wrongful life: a dissenting view. Kennedy B. UCLA Law Rev; 1983 Dec 25; 31(2):473-501. PubMed ID: 11658675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical malpractice: wrongful birth, preconception torts, duty to inform of genetic risks. Sweeney GW. Akron Law Rev; 1979 Dec 25; 13(2):390-400. PubMed ID: 11665144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mothers as plaintiffs in prenatal tort liability cases: recovery for physical and emotional damages. Bernier BL. Harv Womens Law J; 1981 Dec 25; 4(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 11649448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hummel v. Reiss: the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a step backward in its recognition of wrongful life. Barrett TA. Rutgers Law Rev; 1993 Dec 25; 46(1):535-63. PubMed ID: 11652806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three state appellate courts would deny claims for "wrongful life" but would award some kind of damages to parents for "wrongful birth" of disabled child. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1979 Dec 25; 3(5):314-7. PubMed ID: 11665055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo. New Jersey. Supreme Court. Atl Report; 1984 Aug 01; 478():755-73. PubMed ID: 11648486 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Wrongful birth in the abortion context--critique of existing case law and proposal for future actions. Morris KL. Denver Law J; 1976 Aug 01; 53(3):501-20. PubMed ID: 11663712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The injury of birth: Minnesota's statutory prohibition of postconception negligence actions. McAfee PA. William Mitchell Law Rev; 1988 Aug 01; 14(3):701-58. PubMed ID: 11650185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]