These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 11658991

  • 21. Complexity of ethical decision making in psychiatry.
    Morenz B, Sales B.
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11654854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Autonomy, self determination, the right of involuntarily committed persons to refuse treatment, and the use of substituted judgment in medication decisions involving incompetent persons.
    Hermann DH.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 2286496
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
    Dresser RS.
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Albany debates plan to force treatment on the mentally ill.
    Hernandez R.
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul 04; ():20. PubMed ID: 11648128
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. United States v. Leatherman.
    U.S. District Court, District of Columbia.
    Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct 05; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM, Grudzinskas AJ, Pinals DA.
    Wis L Rev; 2001 Oct 05; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ.
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993 Oct 05; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Advances in mental health: a case for the right to refuse treatment.
    Levick M, Wapner A.
    Temple Law Q; 1975 Oct 05; 48(2):354-83. PubMed ID: 11664437
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996 Oct 05; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Schizophrenic patients' retrospective attitudes regarding involuntary psychopharmacological treatment and restraint.
    Naber D, Kircher T, Hessel K.
    Eur Psychiatry; 1996 Oct 05; 11(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660396
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993 Oct 05; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
    Malmquist CP.
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985 Oct 05; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. On the right of "nondangerous" incompetent patients to leave psychiatric units against medical advice.
    DeGrazia D.
    Contemp Philos; 1992 Sep 05; 14(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660299
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent.
    Santurri EN, Werpehowski W.
    Thought; 1982 Dec 05; 57(227):484-501. PubMed ID: 11649637
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Medical, ethical and legal considerations of electroconvulsive therapy.
    MacDonald RP.
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1984 Dec 05; 22(4):683-710. PubMed ID: 11658852
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Of the parens patriae commitment power and drug treatment of schizophrenia: do the benefits to the patient justify involuntary treatment?
    DuBose EZ.
    Minn Law Rev; 1976 Jun 05; 60(6):1149-218. PubMed ID: 11664731
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984 Jun 05; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Legal and ethical issues in neuroleptic noncompliance.
    Schwartz HI.
    Psychiatr Ann; 1986 Oct 05; 16(10):588-591, 594-595. PubMed ID: 11658967
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.