These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
687 related items for PubMed ID: 11659012
1. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy. Brooks AD. Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs. Cort RS. UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs. Cichon DE. LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984 Nov; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD, Stone AA. Harvard J Legis; 1983 Nov; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH. Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications. Knepper K. Law Psychol Rev; 1996 May; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction. Arrigo BA. J Law Health; 1996 May; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code. Dix GE. St Marys Law J; 1984 May; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications. Parry JW. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990 May; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues in inpatient practice. Sider RC. Psychiatr Med Update Mass Gen Hosp Rev Physicians; 1986 May; 4(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 11659331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment. Allan A, Allan M. S Afr Law J; 1997 May; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I. UMKC Law Rev; 1975 May; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The scope of the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs: an analysis of the least restrictive alternative doctrine. Dudzik CJ. Villanova Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 28(1):101-48. PubMed ID: 11658466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]