These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

404 related items for PubMed ID: 11659370

  • 1. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
    Farber DA, Nowak JE.
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK, Williams LB.
    Washburn Law J; 1993 Apr; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abortion--an update.
    Guthman HL.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985 Apr; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD.
    St Marys Law J; 1980 Apr; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S.
    Washburn Law J; 1990 Apr; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE.
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984 Apr; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
    Stuhlbarg SF.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA.
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP.
    Temple Law Rev; 1994 Apr; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A.
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul 17; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992 Jul 17; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA.
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991 Jul 17; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S.
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988 Jul 17; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA.
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984 Jul 17; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
    Allen AL.
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov 17; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Abortion: a new round.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov 24; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD.
    Neb Law Rev; 1989 Nov 24; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG, Schrock CT.
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984 Nov 24; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW.
    West VA Law Rev; 1983 Nov 24; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA.
    Temple Law Rev; 1993 Nov 24; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.