These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
295 related items for PubMed ID: 11659794
1. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes. Muller RJ. Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Davis v. Davis: what about future disputes? Feliciano T. Conn Law Rev; 1993; 26(1):305-53. PubMed ID: 11660034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology. Hemphill L. Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos. Poole EK. Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications. Wurmbrand MJ. South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The implications of Davis v. Davis for reproductive rights analysis. Prygoski PJ. Tenn Law Rev; 1994 Jul; 61(2):609-46. PubMed ID: 11652933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court gives ex-husband rights on use of embryos. Smothers R. N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun 02; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]