These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

512 related items for PubMed ID: 11659979

  • 1. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
    Berg P.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
    Jipping TL.
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abortion's shrinking majority.
    Murphy J.
    Time; 1986 Jun 23; 127(25):30-1. PubMed ID: 11645638
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason.
    Call EC.
    J Fam Law; 1986 Jun 23; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
    Kreimer SF.
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun 23; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Pennsylvania abortion case.
    Benshoof J.
    Touro Law Rev; 1993 Jun 23; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Unburdening the undue burden standard: orienting Casey in constitutional jurisprudence.
    Metzger GE.
    Columbia Law Rev; 1994 Jun 23; 94():2025-89. PubMed ID: 11660149
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC.
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun 23; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Abortion regulation: the circumscription of state intervention by the doctrine of informed consent.
    Abbot L.
    Georgia Law Rev; 1981 Jun 23; 15(3):681-713. PubMed ID: 11658321
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Informed consent and abortion.
    Kapp MB.
    Wis L Rev; 1993 Jun 23; 1993(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 11659680
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights?
    Chervin CI.
    Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan 23; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The aftermath of Casey: is a sonogram requirement unduly burdensome?
    Trense CF.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993 Jan 23; 17():225-41. PubMed ID: 11659925
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML.
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982 Jan 23; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA.
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar 23; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The center holds!
    Dworkin R.
    New York Rev Books; 1992 Aug 13; 39(14):29-33. PubMed ID: 11656267
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.