These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

395 related items for PubMed ID: 11660011

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep 21; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec 17; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP.
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993 Dec 17; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun 13; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG, Schrock CT.
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984 Jun 13; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Parental consent to abortion: how enforcement can vary.
    Lewin T.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May 28; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647920
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
    Barnard D.
    Am J Law Med; 1987 May 28; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
    Curry RE.
    J Fam Law; 1987 May 28; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ.
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982 May 28; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
    Farber DA, Nowak JE.
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr 28; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.