These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

600 related items for PubMed ID: 11660229

  • 1. Institutional review boards, genetic research, and privacy.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):6. PubMed ID: 11660229
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dangerous intersections.
    Korn D.
    Issues Sci Technol; 1996 Sep; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11654761
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. New confidentiality duties for institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660761
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Institutional review boards would have to verify certain confidentiality protections.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):9. PubMed ID: 11658038
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Regulatory orphans: juvenile prisoners as transvulnerable research subjects.
    Reed JG.
    IRB; 1999 Jan; 21(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 11657875
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Institutional review boards now given explicit responsibility in new federal rule.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Feb; 10(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654158
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
    Reiser SJ, Knudson P.
    IRB; 1993 Jan; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM.
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988 Sep; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Confidentiality certificates: a measure of privacy protection.
    Reatig N.
    IRB; 1979 May; 1(3):1-4+. PubMed ID: 11661647
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Gene therapy in mental retardation: ethical considerations.
    Fletcher JC.
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 1995 May; 1():7-13. PubMed ID: 11660293
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The law of institutional review boards.
    Robertson JA.
    UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 26(3):484-549. PubMed ID: 11661806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.