These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards now given explicit responsibility in new federal rule. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1995 Feb; 10(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary. Reiser SJ, Knudson P. IRB; 1993 Jan; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns. Kobasic DM. J Coll Univ Law; 1988 Sep; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidentiality certificates: a measure of privacy protection. Reatig N. IRB; 1979 May; 1(3):1-4+. PubMed ID: 11661647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene therapy in mental retardation: ethical considerations. Fletcher JC. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 1995 May; 1():7-13. PubMed ID: 11660293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent legislation on genetics and insurance. Davis HR, Mitrius JV. Jurimetrics; 1996 May; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11658097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of institutional review boards on clinical research. Levine RJ. Perspect Biol Med; 1996 May; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The law of institutional review boards. Robertson JA. UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 26(3):484-549. PubMed ID: 11661806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]