These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 11660508

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
    Pine RN, Law SA.
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. High court sets review on abortion.
    Barbash F.
    Washington Post; 1982 May 25; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11647754
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ.
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982 May 25; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A.
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973 May 25; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Abortion rights of minors weighed.
    Taylor S.
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov 04; ():B32. PubMed ID: 11647378
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S.
    Washburn Law J; 1990 Nov 04; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Constitutionality of a city ordinance regulating the performance of abortion (city of Akron v. Akron Center of Reproductive Health). US Supreme Court, Decision Nos. 81746, 811172, June 15, 1983 (Supreme Court Reporter = S.Ct. 103 (1983, 2481-2517).
    Med Law; 1985 Nov 04; 4(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 4038540
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB.
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990 Nov 04; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J.
    Const Law J; 1993 Nov 04; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.