These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
625 related items for PubMed ID: 11660533
21. Issues related to the protection of human research participants. Harrison L. J Neurosurg Nurs; 1993 Jun; 25(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 11660053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The FDA's enforcement of IRBs and patient informed consent. Kelsey FO. Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jan; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11651627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Walking a thin line: distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm. Schuchardt EJ. Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1992 Jan; 26(1):77-115. PubMed ID: 11651647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. FDA's new rule on treatment use and sale of investigational new drugs. Levine RJ. IRB; 1987 Jan; 9(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories. McGough H. IRB; 1998 Jan; 20(1):9, 11. PubMed ID: 11655326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The FDA's final regulations: IRBs and medical devices. Holder AR. IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB. Mitchell SC, Steingrub J. IRB; 1988 Jan; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. In tests on people, who watches the watchers? Hilts PJ. N Y Times Web; 1999 May 25; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11648129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects -- final reflections. Katz J. Account Res; 1996 May 25; 4(3-4):277-83. PubMed ID: 11654523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials. Weijer C. IRB; 1998 May 25; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An update on the PEG-SOD study involving incompetent subjects: FDA permits an exception to informed consent requirements. Prentice ED, Antonson DL, Leibrock LG, Prabhu VC, Kelso TK, Sears TD. IRB; 1994 May 25; 16(1-2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11652322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III). Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan 25; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Court tells jury to ignore human subject protection regulations. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1995 Mar 25; 10(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe. Kiernan V. New Sci; 1996 Jun 08; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Research subject loses case against physician, IRB, and hospital. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1995 Feb 08; 10(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]