These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


164 related items for PubMed ID: 11660676

  • 1. Patients' rights of access to their health records.
    Davies J.
    Med Law Int; 1996; 2(3):189-213. PubMed ID: 11660676
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The evolution of informed consent in American medicine.
    Friedlander WJ.
    Perspect Biol Med; 1995; 38(3):498-510. PubMed ID: 11644691
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P.
    J Law Health; 1995; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. McInerney v. MacDonald.
    Canada. Supreme Court.
    Dom Law Rep; 1992 Jun 11; 93():415-31. PubMed ID: 12041089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
    Giesen D, Hayes J.
    Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992 Jun 11; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A patient's right of access to medical records.
    Kirby MD.
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1995 Jun 11; 12(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 8907106
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Australian High Court rules on medical records.
    Cordner S, Ettershank K.
    Lancet; 1996 Sep 21; 348(9030):818. PubMed ID: 11654511
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Beyond guardianship reform: a reevaluation of autonomy and beneficence for a system of principled decision-making in long term care.
    Barnes AP.
    Emory Law J; 1992 Sep 21; 41(3):633-760. PubMed ID: 11657640
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Medical records: law, paternalism and harm.
    Feenan D.
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1995 Sep 21; 29(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 8847682
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Informed consent in the prescription drug context: the special case.
    Tietz GF.
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr 21; 61(2):367-417. PubMed ID: 11652502
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Who's the parent here? The family's impact on the autonomy of older persons.
    Kapp MB.
    Emory Law J; 1992 Apr 21; 41(3):773-803. PubMed ID: 11657641
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
    Howard JJ.
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul 21; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The patient's right to know of a cancer diagnosis: a comparison of Japanese paternalism and American self-determination.
    Higuchi N.
    Washburn Law J; 1992 Jul 21; 31(3):455-73. PubMed ID: 11651604
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Consent, autonomy and the infantilised patient.
    Robertshaw P, Thacker R.
    Med Law Int; 1993 Jul 21; 1(1):33-56. PubMed ID: 11659739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Medical decision-making: patient participation.
    Wolfgarten A, Khan A.
    Med Leg J; 1984 Jul 21; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Commentary: no more jurisdiction over Jehovah.
    Goldblatt AD.
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999 Jul 21; 27(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 11657466
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
    Carnerie F.
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar 21; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.