These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

575 related items for PubMed ID: 11660744

  • 1. The British law on assisted reproduction: a liberal law by comparison with many other European laws.
    Sutton A.
    Ethics Med; 1996; 12(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 11660744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
    Stenger RL.
    J Law Health; 1996; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Regulating the new reproductive technologies: a cross-channel comparison.
    Latham M.
    Med Law Int; 1998; 3(2-3):89-115. PubMed ID: 11657600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
    Great Britain.
    Halsburys Statut Engl G B; 1990 Nov 01; 38():105-61. PubMed ID: 12041434
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The regulation of assisted conception in England.
    Stern K.
    Eur J Health Law; 1994 Nov 01; 1(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11654549
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Supplementary annual report, Appendix VII: BMA response to DHSS consultation document "Legislation on human infertility services and embryo research.
    British Medical Association.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May 16; 294(6582):1303-4. PubMed ID: 11653788
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Embryo research: British debate under way.
    Nature; 1989 Nov 30; 342(6249):463. PubMed ID: 11644395
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Rules and ethics concerning assisted procreation established by the government in Germany.
    Krebs D.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Mar 30; 13(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 11644839
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biotechnology, law and ethics: the new Norwegian Act on Medical Use of Biotechnology (Act No. 56 of 5 August 1994).
    Warberg LA.
    Eur J Health Law; 1996 Jun 30; 3(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 11654766
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Artificial reproduction and child custody.
    Dickens BM.
    Can Bar Rev; 1987 Mar 30; 66(1):49-75. PubMed ID: 11658911
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fetus in Germany: the Fetus Protection Law of 12.13.1990.
    Deutsch E.
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun 30; 3(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 11651385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Embryo research and fertilisation code.
    Walker A.
    BMJ; 1991 Mar 30; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
    Schenker JG, Frenkel DA.
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul 30; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Whose child is it anyway?
    Platt EF.
    Med Leg J; 1994 Jul 30; 62 ( Pt 4)():180-97. PubMed ID: 7845312
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Council agrees response to Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan 19; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Embryo bill could allow children to trace biological fathers.
    Kingman S.
    New Sci; 1985 Jan 19; 124(1696-1697):5. PubMed ID: 11659194
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.