These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
168 related items for PubMed ID: 11662737
21. Which subjects should an IRB protect? Two moral models. Lackey DP. IRB; 1982; 4(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 11651703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Questions of ethics. Lancet; 1988 Dec 10; 2(8624):1379. PubMed ID: 11644354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Regulated research. Lasagna L. Sciences (New York); 1979 Sep 10; 19(7):30. PubMed ID: 11661730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New confidentiality duties for institutional review boards. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb 10; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Informed consent to participate in research: Part II. Levine RJ. Bioethics Dig; 1977 Apr 10; 1(12):1-16. PubMed ID: 11664810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Pandora's box in research: compensating the victims. Omang J. Washington Post; 1979 Jan 31; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11648926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Protection of human subjects in research projects. Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Apr 30; 126(68):S4365-73. PubMed ID: 11661858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Regulation of clinical research: who's protecting who from what? Petricciani JC. Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1979 Apr 30; 34(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 11661718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Safeguards questioned: some worry that policies to protect human research subjects may be inadequate. Burd S. Chron High Educ; 1994 Feb 09; 40():30-1. PubMed ID: 11660767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy. Society; 1975 Feb 09; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of the federal government in protecting citizens from communicable diseases. Morgenstern MS. Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1978 Feb 09; 47(4):537-71. PubMed ID: 11664964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of institutional review boards on clinical research. Levine RJ. Perspect Biol Med; 1978 Feb 09; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation. Horan DJ. Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan 09; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974. U.S. US Statut Large; 1974 Jan 09; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Deception research and the HHS final regulations. Dresser RS. IRB; 1981 Apr 09; 3(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11661944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975 Apr 09; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The FDA's final regulations: IRBs and medical devices. Holder AR. IRB; 1980 Apr 09; 2(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The law of institutional review boards. Robertson JA. UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Feb 09; 26(3):484-549. PubMed ID: 11661806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Confidentiality certificates: a measure of privacy protection. Reatig N. IRB; 1979 May 09; 1(3):1-4+. PubMed ID: 11661647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Proposed regulations on fetal research--and some reactions! Contemp Ob Gyn; 1975 Nov 09; 6(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 11664652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]