These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 11662770

  • 1. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes.
    Bartleman A.
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability.
    Blank RH.
    West Polit Q; 1984 Dec; 37(4):584-602. PubMed ID: 11655744
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached.
    Slandell H.
    Temple Law Q; 1979 Dec; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Abortion and privacy.
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1973 Jan 26; ():12. PubMed ID: 11649086
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
    Tapovatz WE.
    St Marys Law J; 1974 Jan 26; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
    Sendor BB.
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975 Jan 26; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Abortion: problems of legal logic.
    Crawford J.
    Month; 1980 Apr 26; 13(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 11655473
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR.
    Temple Law Q; 1974 Apr 26; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
    Haley JN.
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974 Apr 26; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV.
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973 Apr 26; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA.
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep 26; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Colautti v. Franklin. 9 Jan 1979.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
    US Supreme Court Rep; 1979 Sep 26; 439():379-409. PubMed ID: 11646023
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D, Nasser WP.
    Haw Bar J; 1975 Sep 26; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fetal viability and individual autonomy: resolving medical and legal standards for abortion.
    Cohen LA.
    UCLA Law Rev; 1980 Aug 26; 27(6):1340-64. PubMed ID: 11655391
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
    Dyke MC.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov 26; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Granfield D.
    Jurist; 1973 Nov 26; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. "A new Constitutional right": the Supreme Court and abortion.
    De Borst J.
    Reform J; 1973 Apr 26; 23(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11663641
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Supreme Court on abortion--a dissenting opinion.
    Onley PT, McKenna RJ.
    Cathol Lawyer; 1973 Apr 26; 19(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11663413
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Constitutional law--a new Constitutional right to an abortion.
    Watt RL.
    North Carol Law Rev; 1973 Oct 26; 51(6):1573-84. PubMed ID: 11663419
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N.
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar 26; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.