These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
262 related items for PubMed ID: 11662950
1. Futurity and permissibility of genetic engineering: the legal challenges. Westra J. Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1974; 1(3):499-509. PubMed ID: 11662950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "Unwanted, anonymous, biological descendants": mandatory donation laws and laws prohibiting preembryo discard violate the constitutional right to privacy. Brown JP. Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1993; 28(1):183-237. PubMed ID: 11659778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of recombinant DNA technology on genetic screening. Gauthier CC. Public Aff Q; 1989 Jan; 3(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 11651935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR. Temple Law Q; 1974 Jan; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues. Waltz JR, Thigpen CR. Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jan; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy. Smith GP. South Ill Univ Law J; 1985 Jan; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications. Wurmbrand MJ. South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA. Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Manipulating the genetic code: jurisprudential conundrums. Smith GP. Georgetown Law J; 1976 Feb; 64(3):697-733. PubMed ID: 11660899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments. Rice CE. Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The duty to prevent handicaps: laws promoting the prevention of handicaps to newborns. Parness JA. West New Engl Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 5(3):431-64. PubMed ID: 11658603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV. Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973 Feb; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP. St Marys Law J; 1976 Feb; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications. Reback GL. Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness. Baker JD. Miss Law Rev; 1975 May; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response. Scotland AG. Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment. Byrn RM. America (NY); 1976 Jun 19; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]