These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

418 related items for PubMed ID: 11663042

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
    Prentice ED, Antonson DL.
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
    Moline ML, Aisen MW.
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
    Hogue LL.
    Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies.
    Prentice ED, Gordon B.
    IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ethics of research involving children.
    Lynch A.
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Oct; 25(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 11659510
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. How many protocols are deferred? One IRB's experience.
    Chlebowski RT.
    IRB; 1984 Oct; 6(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650665
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
    Society; 1975 Oct; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH.
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975 Aug; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
    Bryant LE.
    John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974 Aug; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada).
    NCBHR Commun; 1991 Sep; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
    Bennett PB, Kylstra JA.
    Forsvarsmedicin; 1973 Sep; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The subject is children.
    Hiatt F.
    Trial; 1975 Sep; 11(6):19+. PubMed ID: 11662203
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.