These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

619 related items for PubMed ID: 11663654

  • 1. Abortion and human rights.
    Horan DJ, Gorby JD.
    Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment.
    Byrn RM.
    America (NY); 1976 Jun 19; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sandra Day O'Connor and the justification of abortion.
    Werhane PH.
    Theor Med; 1984 Oct 19; 5(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 11644178
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
    Brockway AR.
    Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb 19; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Self-identification and the morality of abortion.
    Lusby K.
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992 Feb 19; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR.
    Temple Law Q; 1974 Feb 19; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society.
    Hicks SC.
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991 Feb 19; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH.
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov 19; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M.
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982 Nov 19; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA.
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990 Nov 19; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Abortion: the moral status of the unborn.
    Werner R.
    Soc Theory Pract; 1974 Nov 19; 3(2):201-22. PubMed ID: 11663640
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The decline of personhood.
    Wauck J.
    Hum Life Rev; 1988 Nov 19; 14(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 11655918
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life.
    Prygoski PJ.
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992 Nov 19; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Brain birth: a proposal for defining when a fetus is entitled to human life status.
    Gertler GB.
    South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul 19; 59(5):1061-78. PubMed ID: 11655850
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Homo sapienism: critique of Roe v. Wade and abortion.
    Lewis JL.
    Albany Law Rev; 1975 Jul 19; 39(4):856-93. PubMed ID: 11661205
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
    Parness JA, Pritchard SK.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982 Jul 19; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T.
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul 19; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.